Category Archives: Control panel

Custom vs Standard Control Panels

Custom vs. Standard (Part 2): Not All Custom Control Panels Carry the Same Margin Risk

Custom could mean a lot of things. Do it all the time, it becomes standard. Never done before, it’s custom.

For this context, let’s look at custom from the panel builders view, not the end application. The custom system will be ‘Engineered to Order. Engineering time is quoted on the job. It also doesn’t roll down the line exactly like the previous (or next panels).

Custom vs Standard Control Panels
Engineered to Order panel have engineering hours billed to a project. For  lower volumes ( generally, sometimes one-off’s) it’s a larger component of the cost/price.

We split these custom categories into two.

The Two Types of “Custom” (And Why Their Margins Differ)

The Domain Specialist (Configured ETO): If a panel shop builds custom municipal water/wastewater packages every week, every panel is technically engineered-to-order, but the shop is building from a reservoir of institutional knowledge and precedent designs. The estimators know the pitfalls, the shop floor staff know the component quirks, margins are protected.

The Clean-Sheet Builder (True Prototype ETO – First-of-Kind): When a shop bids on a one-off machine architecture or an unfamiliar industry spec, the build requires an R&D effort. This is where unbilled engineering hours, scrap materials, and test-bay delays could eat project margin.

Standard panels generally have: off-the-shelf parts, automated wire machines, quick assembly, and rapid cash flow. Custom panels break from that. When a shop loses money on a custom build, it is usually not material costs—it is generally operational costs.

Where the Margins Get Burned

1. Upfront Design & Quoting

  • Unbilled Engineering: Standard jobs use proven drawings. Clean-sheet custom jobs require real engineering time upfront just to model clearances, run thermal calculations, and verify UL 508A Short-Circuit Current Ratings (SCCR) before anyone orders a single part.

  • Customer Vendor Lists (AVLs): When a spec forces a builder to use an unfamiliar vendor list, they lose their bulk volume pricing and get saddled with long-lead items they can’t easily swap out.

2. Cash Flow & Procurement

  • Tied-Up Capital: Builders cannot rely on shelf stock. The Bill of Materials often includes high-dollar, non-returnable components—specialty communication gateways, custom-punched enclosures, or large breaker accessories—that tie up cash while waiting on late deliveries.

  • Milestone Billing Delays: Standard panels get invoiced the day they ship. Custom jobs often trap final payments behind submittal approvals, change orders, and witnessed sign-offs.

3. Shop Floor Costs

  • Tough Fabrication: Machining 316 stainless or punching cast-aluminum NEMA 7/9 explosion-proof enclosures destroys standard tooling and slows production to a crawl.

  • Manual Muscle: Custom design may have parts that have to be fabricated.  Technicians may have to cut, bend, deburr, and torque things manually.

  • Engineering Interruptions: Wire technicians cannot run on autopilot. They might need design engineers out on the floor redlining drawings and sorting out physical clearance clashes.

4. Testing & Floor Space Lockup

  • Test Bay Deadlock: A standard panel takes an hour to test and crate. A custom multi-door lineup can hold a high-voltage test bay hostage for weeks during customer-witnessed Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT).

  • Documentation Overhead: Custom builds demand massive paperwork packages—point-to-point check sheets, torque logs, and detailed QA records.

Bottomline:

Custom panels can bring in higher profits, but the risk profile is higher. The key is knowing which type of custom job you’re bidding. Building a familiar system is great business; taking on a clean-sheet prototype without pricing in the engineering, floor labor, and testing will eat into margin. It can be done, it just requires more research, background knowledge and up front planning.

Share
Margin variances of custom vs standard control panels

Custom vs. Standard Control Panels: Why Custom Builds Make 2x the Profit (Part 1)

Recently, I looked into the gross margin spread between custom and standard industrial control panels. How feasible is it to increase the availability of customized control panels—and can it be done profitably?

The industry numbers reveal an interesting paradox:

  • High-volume OEM builds: typically operate at 15%–25% gross margins.

  • Custom Engineer-to-Order (ETO) panels: routinely command 35%–50% gross margins.

 

Margin variances of custom vs standard control panels
Custom vs Standard ( Note: Engineering dollars per panel)

At first glance, this feels counterintuitive. If a custom build requires double or triple the engineering time amortized across a lower volume of panels, shouldn’t those extra labor hours erode profitability?

The short answer: No. Custom engineering is often billed directly to the project rather than absorbed as overhead. While custom systems carry higher risk due to technical ambiguity and site-specific variables, experienced panel builders mitigate this risk through modular sub-assemblies and deep niche specialization.

Here is why the math works out the way it does:

  1. Cost-Plus vs. Value-Based Pricing: Standard volume panels face intense competitive bidding, forcing shops into cost-plus pricing. Custom ETO builds solve complex, site-specific challenges (like strict UL 508A specs, high short-circuit ratings, or tight legacy footprint retrofits). The client isn’t paying for raw sheet metal and terminal blocks—they are paying to eliminate risk and avoid costly plant downtime.

  2. Engineering as Revenue, Not Overhead: In high-volume manufacturing, non-recurring engineering (NRE) is fixed overhead amortized over hundreds of units. In custom projects, specialized engineering labor, CAD drafting, and Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) are billable line items—often billed at a 2.5x to 3.5x multiplier on engineering wages.

  3. The Risk Premium: Custom projects inherently carry technical ambiguity, so builders factor contingency buffers into quotes. When a shop executes cleanly without scope creep, that risk buffer flows straight to the bottom line as pure profit. (The catch: execution must remain disciplined so contingency hours aren’t burned during testing or rework).

Bottom Line: While high-volume standard builds provide baseline shop throughput and predictable baseline cash flow, custom systems act as the true gross-margin engine.

The Custom vs. Standard Series

This is Part 1 of a 5-part series exploring control panel economics and engineering strategy:

  • Part 1: Profit Margins Explained (You are here)

  • Part 2: What Actually Makes a Panel “Custom”?

  • Part 3: The Dollar Split: Where Does the Budget Actually Go?

  • Part 4: What’s in the Cost: Hidden Drivers of Panel Fabrication

  • Part 5: How to Defend Your Bottom Line on ETO Projects

Always interested in hearing from folks on the shop floor or in the control panel space: Does this margin spread reflect what you see in your own operation? Drop your thoughts in the comments below.

 

 

 

 

 

Share

It’s Getting Hot in Here: Thermal Management for Control Panels

Building on last weeks Control Panel Insights, this weeks list is thermal management tips from industry. Control panels get hot, things start to fail. Equipment failure from poor climate control, heat stagnation, or layout problems ties into the  42% of unplanned equipment downtime experienced in industry. Following a few rules alleviates most of the problems.

1. The 10°C Life Expectancy Rule

Heat is the primary factor in premature component aging. For every 10°C increase in operating temperature, the life of electrolytic capacitors are cut in half. Beyond capacitors, thermal stress destabilizes solid-state semiconductors. Heat introduces electron gate leakage and accelerates microfluidic trace degradation – resulting in exeuction latency, logic corruption and sudden system reboots.  Experienced your computer rebooting suddenly, check the fans and ventilation. 

Deep Dive/ Source: Read the physics behind electrolyte degradation in the Cornell Dubilier Capacitor Lifetime Technical Paper or review standard semiconductor acceleration modeling via the Texas Instruments Component Lifetime Report.

2. Managing Stratification ( Heat Layers)

Air naturally layers in an enclosure. The top of your cabinet acts as a “hot zone” where internal air flows accumulate. Because of this vertical gradient, we must plan layout locations based on component thresholds. While heavy power distribution can survive higher limits, sensitive components like PLCs and power supplies have a much lower critical ceiling (often 40degC) and must be kept out of that upper ceiling.

3. VFD Vertical Clearance

VFDs are essentially furnaces for the rest of your components. A “clear sky” zone—usually 4 to 6 inches—above the drive allows for the exhaust plume to dissipate without affecting sensitive components above or around it.

Deep Dive: The Schneider Electric Altivar Installation Manual covers standard clearance rules. For a brand-agnostic engineering framework, consult global enclosure spacing standards like IEC 61439-1 (Low-voltage switchgear and controlgear assemblies). The standard uses a mathematical verification of temperature rise and clearance paths instead of a steadfast range like 4-6 inches.

4. The Nuance of “Zero-Stack” Spacing

Modern drives often claim they can be mounted side-by-side with no gap. Just remember the fine print: that often comes with specific derating or ambient temperature caps to manage lateral heat transfer.

Verification: Schneider Electric Altivar Technical Documentation.

5. Avoiding Airflow “Dead Zones”

Panels with high-CFM fans that still fail because the wire duct is too dense. We look for at least 30% unobstructed cross-sectional area to ensure air actually moves through the components rather than around them.

Insight: Established Industry Best Practice.

To Conclude : Strategic Place Components 

The layout of components for best results is to  keep high-sensitivity digital logic (like PLCs, communication modules, and I/O) in the cooler bottom-left regions. Big heat producers like VFDs, servo drives, and transformers belong in the upper-middle zones. This geometry effectively accounts for the natural rise of air density currents to move thermal energy away from logic and more sensitive electronics.

 

Share

Top 5 Control Panel Insights – From Industrial People

This week, I reviewed the most engaging industrial control panel threads on r/plc and used a Gemini prompt to aggregate the community’s best advice:

  • Thermal Management: To prevent premature failure from rising heat, avoid placing heat-sensitive devices above heat-generating ones like Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs). This seems obvious, but nuances exist—I will expand on this in a deeper dive later.

  • The “25% Expansion Rule”: Always leave 25–30% open space on back panels and DIN rails. This allows for future system modifications without requiring a full cabinet replacement.

  • Back Panel Labeling: Mount component labels directly to the mounting plate rather than wire duct covers. This ensures technicians can still see the labels during maintenance, and prevents them from getting lost when someone removes the duct covers.

  • EMI Mitigation: Maintain strict physical separation between high-voltage AC power and low-voltage DC control signals to prevent electromagnetic interference. You cannot ignore this rule. It is like smoking cigarettes: EMI will be the diagnosis for all future mysterious ailments of the system.

  • Hinge Wire Management: Use “S” or “U” shaped service loops at door hinges so wires twist rather than pull, which prevents mechanical fatigue.

Next week, I will update these bullets with links to deep-dive posts—especially for points 1 and 4.

Share

Control Panel Layout: Top Tips with some Photos

Amongst the control panel layout tips out there, some are practical, many are good and some are downright weird. There are is a wealth of it in the /PLC sub-reddit. Some of it is amusingly opiniated:

 

The following is my collection of top tips on control panel layouts. A few of the panel posts from Reddit are embedded below. Will add more pointers as I come across them.

 

Busbar candy
byu/Otherwise_Feed_3320 inPLC

1. Heat rises

Do the heat calculations. Enclosure vendors usually have free tools for this like this .

    • If ventilation is needed, fan at the bottom, exhaust at the top, not the other way around. Hot air rises and leaves the panel, cool air comes in the bottom.

2. Power protection components at the top. Circuit breakers, disconnects. The temperature rating on circuit breakers are usually higher than the average PLC, drive or anything that has electronics for that matter. Example here – 30A breaker from SE has an operational ambient of 158 degF/70 degC. Accessibility and safety is also better with power devices at the top. 

3. Incoming power. This really depends on the install site/location. If you have a choice, some would argue that’s it’s better for incoming power to come in from the bottom. With gravity, holes and inlets at the top of the panel have poor contingencies in the event of condensation or dirt coming in( or even water ingress- say NEMA 4/4X failure situations) . 

4. Wire labels, terminals, and wire markers

    • Avoid putting the label on the device. If the device gets replaced, the label goes with it.
    • Sometimes end users may require label on device also. Check before it gets to the FAT
    • Harmonize labelling such that it can be traced back to schematics. This will help with maintenance folks and any troubleshooting efforts.

5. Wireway

    • Vertical runs should intersect with a horizontal run such that the horizontal run stops the vertical cover from sliding down
    • Plan it out such that control wiring is separated from power wiring. If they intersect, make it perpendicular.
    • Read on to number 6.

6. Electromagnetic interference

      • Separate 480Vac and  24Vdc ( control and communications) wires. 
      • If they have to cross, it’s best done perpendicularly- ie. they cross at a 90 deg angle. Still avoid having them in proximity. Good explanation of this here
      • Additional sleeving or barriers for EMI mitigation if needed.

 

7. Spacing If the project allows for it, allow for some room between devices, PLC’s, drives, power supplies. This helps with maintenance accessibility. Also, it makes way for future expansions. More I/O if the PLC needs it, another drive …etc..

My new office 😉
byu/adi_dev inPLC

8. Ground connections

    • Spec grounding washers installed and properly torqued to bite through the paint

9. Network cabling

  • Use pre-terminated cables where possible. From a good vendor, reliability is better. 
  • From item 6 above, separate controls communications cables from the power wiring.

10. Maintenance and usability

  • Add a rack on door for reference material

 

“I´m tired boss…”
byu/andisosh inPLC

Will come back and add more as I find it…

 

Share